### Spiritual Learning

The acquisition of knowledge is more a

A

**and therefore isn't***concept***. The weight of***factual***apples is quantifiable (gravity will affect the weight of a specific mass), but how is the extent of knowledge measured? Even mathematics as a factual method of manipulating numbers is based simply on the***1kg***of numbers. What actually is represented by 'a number'? The essence of spirituality has nothing to do with religion and is an issue that deals more with basic psychology.***concept*A

*square has a diagonal of***(1 x 1)**__approximately__**(root 2) and is an irrational number. This quantity can be***1.4142**drawn, but***easily****defined mathematically. The same for the value Ğ» and although it is defined as the ratio of the***never***of a circle to its***circumference**(or the***diameter****to the***area of a circle**), can never be quantified:***square of its radius***even though such a description can be pictorially described. It is the semantic difference between a*__approximately__3.142**and a***drawing**definition.***symbolic**- In any sense of
, should the failure to define and quantify disprove the hypothesis?*'proof'*

**Note added:**

**02.01.2013**

The integration of the

**to***area***adds another dimension: length and breadth (***volume***x**and**y**) incorporate the third dimension of depth (**z**). What may happen if this quantity is integrated to the fourth dimension (**time) or a fifth, sixth..? The fifth or sixth dimension is meaningless to the human psyche. It is unimaginable. Therefore it must be nonsense. But is it?**__not__**Something that is inconceivable**

__does not__**make that something impossible**